| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Epagri-Sede. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/08/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
|
Autoria: |
SANTOS, R. S. S.; GEBLER, L.; ALVES, S. A. M.; ARIOLI, C. J.; LIZ, M. C.; ARAUJO, L.; PETRI, J. L.; SOLDÁ, C.; SANHUEZA, R. M. V.; BONETI, J. I.; MUNARETTO, S.; GONÇALVES, M.; ZANOTTO, R. A.; FRANZOI, G. A. |
|
Título: |
NORMAS PARA SOLICITAÇÃO DE INCLUSÃO DE AGROTÓXICOS E AGROQUÍMICOS NA GRADE DA PRODUÇÃO INTEGRADA DE MAÇÃ - PIM (Safra 2021/22). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Vacaria, RS: Comissão Técnica da Produção Integrada de Maçã, 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
1 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
A GRADE DA PRODUÇÃO INTEGRADA DE MAÇÃ ? PIM é um documento elaborado a partir de 2003, pela comissão técnica da PIM (CTPim), para informar aos técnicos e produtores as características técnicas e os efeitos secundários dos agrotóxicos e agroquímicos registrados no Ministério da Agricultura ? MAPA para a cultura da macieira. É um instrumento básico para a certificação da Produção Integrada de Maçãs e de outras certificações usadas para comercialização da fruta no mercado interno e externo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
fungicidas; inseticidas; reguladores de crescimento. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
D Governo, Leis e Regulamentações |
|
|
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01460nam a2200313 a 4500
001 1129715
005 2020-08-12
008 2020 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aSANTOS, R. S. S.
245 $aNORMAS PARA SOLICITAÇÃO DE INCLUSÃO DE AGROTÓXICOS E AGROQUÍMICOS NA GRADE DA PRODUÇÃO INTEGRADA DE MAÇÃ - PIM (Safra 2021/22).$h[electronic resource]
260 $aVacaria, RS: Comissão Técnica da Produção Integrada de Maçã$c2020
300 $a1 p.
520 $aA GRADE DA PRODUÇÃO INTEGRADA DE MAÇÃ ? PIM é um documento elaborado a partir de 2003, pela comissão técnica da PIM (CTPim), para informar aos técnicos e produtores as características técnicas e os efeitos secundários dos agrotóxicos e agroquímicos registrados no Ministério da Agricultura ? MAPA para a cultura da macieira. É um instrumento básico para a certificação da Produção Integrada de Maçãs e de outras certificações usadas para comercialização da fruta no mercado interno e externo.
653 $afungicidas
653 $ainseticidas
653 $areguladores de crescimento
700 1 $aGEBLER, L.
700 1 $aALVES, S. A. M.
700 1 $aARIOLI, C. J.
700 1 $aLIZ, M. C.
700 1 $aARAUJO, L.
700 1 $aPETRI, J. L.
700 1 $aSOLDÁ, C.
700 1 $aSANHUEZA, R. M. V.
700 1 $aBONETI, J. I.
700 1 $aMUNARETTO, S.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, M.
700 1 $aZANOTTO, R. A.
700 1 $aFRANZOI, G. A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Epagri-Sede (Epagri-Sede) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
|
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Epagri-Sede. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/11/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/11/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PINTO, C. E.; COSTA, M. D.; PASSOS, J. F. M.; GARAGORRY, F. C.; BETTONI, J. C.; SOUZA, J. A.; COSTA JÚNIOR, N. B.; WERNER, S. S.; BALDISSERA, T. C. |
|
Título: |
Light quality effect on biomass allocation of Axonopus catharinensis Valls. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado, RS. Resumos... Viçosa, MG: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2016. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Light is the major resource driving plant production, plant architecture and vegetation dynamic.
Different species can exhibit contrasted strategies to capture and use light. Understanding plant
responses for light is helpful to forecast production and management practices for heterogeneous
light environments (e.g. forage species under trees canopy). The objective was to evaluate the
biomass production and allocation of individual plants of giant missionary grass (Axonopus
catharinensis Valls.) in function of alterations in light quality in a controlled environment. Three
light conditions were simulated in a growth room: low blue light level (B-), low red light level (R-
), and neutral (N - control). Sodium vapor (400 w) and fluorescent lamps was used as light source
and the light conditions were obtained with a Lee filter HT 015, Lee 117 and Lee 216 for low blue,
low red:far red and neutral light respectively. The distance between plants and light sources plus
filters was adjusted in order to provide photon flux with the similar photosynthetic efficiency in
B- (Photosynthetic Active Radiation = 308 μmol m2 s-1), R- (PAR = 363 μmol m2 s-1) and N (PAR
= 381 μmol m2 s-1). Twenty plants (i.e. replicates) from clones was grown individually in pots of
3.6 L in each light treatment at 25 ± 3ºC and 16 h photoperiod. Plants was watered with Hoagland
nutrient solution. After 35 days of growth, plants were colected and separeted in the following
morphological components: leaves, stems and roots. Statistical analysis was performed using R
software. The total biomass production (p-value 0.056) was higher in the neutral (5.54 ± 1.24 g)
and R- (4.90 ± 1.77 g) conditions compared to the B- (3.89 ± 1.30 g). There was no significant
differences in the leaf and stem mass (p-value>0.2325), either for total shoot mass (p-value
0.2385). The roots biomass was lower in the B- (0.86 ± 0.30 g) compared to N and R- (1.42 ± 0.38
and 1.14 ± 0.47 g respectively). Finally, the shoot:root ratio was higher in the B- (3.71 ± 1.51).
The biomass production and allocation on giant missionary grass is more affected by low blue
light than changes in the red:far red light. Blue light has a direct impact on stomatal functioning,
this could be the main factor affecting biomass accumulation. The investment on biomass
allocation to shoot in detriment of roots can be considered a plant strategy to capture more light;
this process can be a result of hormonal balance in function of the plant light
perception. MenosLight is the major resource driving plant production, plant architecture and vegetation dynamic.
Different species can exhibit contrasted strategies to capture and use light. Understanding plant
responses for light is helpful to forecast production and management practices for heterogeneous
light environments (e.g. forage species under trees canopy). The objective was to evaluate the
biomass production and allocation of individual plants of giant missionary grass (Axonopus
catharinensis Valls.) in function of alterations in light quality in a controlled environment. Three
light conditions were simulated in a growth room: low blue light level (B-), low red light level (R-
), and neutral (N - control). Sodium vapor (400 w) and fluorescent lamps was used as light source
and the light conditions were obtained with a Lee filter HT 015, Lee 117 and Lee 216 for low blue,
low red:far red and neutral light respectively. The distance between plants and light sources plus
filters was adjusted in order to provide photon flux with the similar photosynthetic efficiency in
B- (Photosynthetic Active Radiation = 308 μmol m2 s-1), R- (PAR = 363 μmol m2 s-1) and N (PAR
= 381 μmol m2 s-1). Twenty plants (i.e. replicates) from clones was grown individually in pots of
3.6 L in each light treatment at 25 ± 3ºC and 16 h photoperiod. Plants was watered with Hoagland
nutrient solution. After 35 days of growth, plants were colected and separeted in the following
morphological components... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
blue light; forage; light competition; morphological components; red:far red light; roots. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
|
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03431naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1125669
005 2016-11-08
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPINTO, C. E.
245 $aLight quality effect on biomass allocation of Axonopus catharinensis Valls.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aLight is the major resource driving plant production, plant architecture and vegetation dynamic. Different species can exhibit contrasted strategies to capture and use light. Understanding plant responses for light is helpful to forecast production and management practices for heterogeneous light environments (e.g. forage species under trees canopy). The objective was to evaluate the biomass production and allocation of individual plants of giant missionary grass (Axonopus catharinensis Valls.) in function of alterations in light quality in a controlled environment. Three light conditions were simulated in a growth room: low blue light level (B-), low red light level (R- ), and neutral (N - control). Sodium vapor (400 w) and fluorescent lamps was used as light source and the light conditions were obtained with a Lee filter HT 015, Lee 117 and Lee 216 for low blue, low red:far red and neutral light respectively. The distance between plants and light sources plus filters was adjusted in order to provide photon flux with the similar photosynthetic efficiency in B- (Photosynthetic Active Radiation = 308 μmol m2 s-1), R- (PAR = 363 μmol m2 s-1) and N (PAR = 381 μmol m2 s-1). Twenty plants (i.e. replicates) from clones was grown individually in pots of 3.6 L in each light treatment at 25 ± 3ºC and 16 h photoperiod. Plants was watered with Hoagland nutrient solution. After 35 days of growth, plants were colected and separeted in the following morphological components: leaves, stems and roots. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. The total biomass production (p-value 0.056) was higher in the neutral (5.54 ± 1.24 g) and R- (4.90 ± 1.77 g) conditions compared to the B- (3.89 ± 1.30 g). There was no significant differences in the leaf and stem mass (p-value>0.2325), either for total shoot mass (p-value 0.2385). The roots biomass was lower in the B- (0.86 ± 0.30 g) compared to N and R- (1.42 ± 0.38 and 1.14 ± 0.47 g respectively). Finally, the shoot:root ratio was higher in the B- (3.71 ± 1.51). The biomass production and allocation on giant missionary grass is more affected by low blue light than changes in the red:far red light. Blue light has a direct impact on stomatal functioning, this could be the main factor affecting biomass accumulation. The investment on biomass allocation to shoot in detriment of roots can be considered a plant strategy to capture more light; this process can be a result of hormonal balance in function of the plant light perception.
653 $ablue light
653 $aforage
653 $alight competition
653 $amorphological components
653 $ared:far red light
653 $aroots
700 1 $aCOSTA, M. D.
700 1 $aPASSOS, J. F. M.
700 1 $aGARAGORRY, F. C.
700 1 $aBETTONI, J. C.
700 1 $aSOUZA, J. A.
700 1 $aCOSTA JÚNIOR, N. B.
700 1 $aWERNER, S. S.
700 1 $aBALDISSERA, T. C.
773 $tIn: REUNIÃO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado, RS. Resumos... Viçosa, MG: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Epagri-Sede (Epagri-Sede) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
